h1

Review: Shadow on the Land (1968)

October 28, 2009

isfRead about this movie on lewrockwell.com – read an excellent synopsis there too.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/shirtz/shirtz18.1.html

It took some searching to find it, though (try Google) – my copy is on loan from a chap named Kaspar I met at McDonald’s.

It’s well-meaning film, but it’s hampered by the TV movie budget they must have had, even back in 1968, not to mention the anachronisms on display. Get past those, and you’ll find it pretty entertaining.

It’s especially amusing that Gene Hackman(!) is billed third in the movie, after John Forsyth and Jackie Cooper. I suppose you take what you can get early on – three years later, he got The French Connection, so I guess that makes up for it. Hackman is pretty good here, but when is he not?

At least one reviewer seems to think that this was a pilot for a TV show on ABC – I’m tending to agree, since the movie ends rather abruptly. In fact no less than J. Neil Schuman reviewed it there.

h1

Review – Bronson

October 2, 2009

bronson

Saw this at the Milwaukee Film Festival (  http://www.milwaukee-film.org/home.shtml  ). Very entertaining – the short version of the plot – Britain’s most violent prisoner , Michael Gordon Peterson(Tom Hardy) narrates his life behind bars. Charles Bronson is the alias he takes while in the slammer.

Tom Hardy is the standout in this film – he gave a terrific performance in what would be a film without much story. (After all, the man spends years in solitary).  IMDB says chunks of this movie are non-factual, especially a sequence where Bronson is released and earns a living as something like a cage fighter, even fighting dogs at one point.  That’s sad, because I thought that was one of the points of the film where it made Bronson’s life seem little more than an animal’s.  Recommended.

h1

More Banksy Pics

September 25, 2009

Just for your enjoyment…
2313969210104606292S600x600Q85

 

2372096770104606292S600x600Q85

2625521420104606292S600x600Q85

 

2627966050104606292S600x600Q85

2982762460104606292S600x600Q85

h1

Made me laugh/think

September 23, 2009

From this fine website…http://abstrusegoose.com

illusion

h1

Took the Oath yesterday…

September 20, 2009

When riding up to the Tea Party yesterday (well before 3, when it was supposed to start), I hear a member of Oath Keepers http://www.oathkeepers.net/ (I’m sorry to say I don’t know who was speaking) speaking to the crowd.  He read the list of orders they won’t obey, and then invited the crowd to take the oath to the Constitution, which I did.

I took the oath in all seriousness, and was proud to have done so. Buto n the ride home, I thought to myself, Now how does the Oath apply to me?

No one’s sworn me into any militia (let’s let slide the fact I’m already supposed to be in it for now). How do I go about fulfilling this Oath, right now?  Cause for thought…

h1

Speak truth to power!

September 19, 2009

From Balko’s website – An Aussie takes us to task for being too tame when talking back to our political “betters”…

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/09/16/an-australian-take-on-joe-wilson/

That article just linked had a further link of some quotes from Pual J Keating critisizing the Australian opposition - the ones I like…

That you Jim? Paul Keating here. Just because you swallowed a fucking dictionary when you were about 15 doesn’t give you the right to pour a bucket of shit over the rest of us.”
- To Former Labour politician, Jim McClelland (on the phone)

Codd will be lucky to get a job cleaning shithouses if I ever become Prime Minister.
- On Mike Codd

…the brain-damaged Leader of the Opposition…
- On John Howard

Let me echo Balko – the country would be a better place if we told these bastards off once in a while.

h1

Yet more HOTTT Tea Party Action…

September 17, 2009

Going to the Veteran’s Park Tea Party – it’s nice I can bike there from my house – wish they had gotten Claire Wolfe to speak rather than Michelle Malkin, though.

h1

Norman Borlaug – RIP

September 14, 2009

For those who haven’t heard, here’s the Wikipedia entry…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Borlaug

Having saved the lives of millions due to his research, memorials should be built to honor him. And if there is a God, this man now walks in Heaven.

h1

Cerebus: Wrapup

September 14, 2009

I wish I could look back on my adult life, post-1970, and say something more optimistic than “if feminism hadn’t come along I never would have become this isolated, this distanced from human society and I would have felt no need to do three hundred issues of Cerebus”.  That isolation is so central to who I am and has been so critical to whatever progress I have made as an artist, writer, and publisher, I can’t even begin to conceive of where another path might have led me.

Dave Sim, Introduction to Women, Fourth Printing, September 1998

What is there to say about this work of Art (and make no mistake, it is Art)? Reading through it,and looking at the more-often-than-not gorgeous line art, I’m both amazed and frustrated by some of the choices he made.

Can Sim truthfully act surprised that his dissertation of the Books of Moshe (Latter Days), and his attempt to reconcile God with Einstein’s Unified Field theory, however well-reasoned, published within the confines of his mammoth graphic novel featuring a hermaphroditic talking aardvark*, would not make a stir?  Put another way – would Thomas Paine’s Common Sense have made any ripples had the main points been couched in a story about pirates seeking gold in “Death Cove”?

And his decision to publish 300 serialized issues – was there some sort of bargain he made with himself forbidding a change of heart?

Onion: From an artistic standpoint, do you regret the series having come to an end?

Dave Sim: No, not at all. It was pure guesswork on my part back in 1979 as to whether I would have the stamina to write, pencil, ink, letter, tone, and fill the back of a monthly comic book for 26 years. In retrospect, I should’ve said 250 issues.

Interview with Tasha Robinson, The Onion, March 31, 2004

Lacking any editor but himself, there was no one around to rein him in on his excesses (the decision of having his character Cerebus intrude on some really heartfelt dissertations on the artist’s path (Reads), Ernest Hemingway, (Form & Void) F. Scott Fitzgerald (Going Home), and Oscar Wilde (Jaka’s Story & Melmoth) just to name a few off the top of  my head). I also believe that the plan Sim had detailing the story arc of Cerebus was painted with wide brush strokes rather than a detail brush – something he himself confirms in the introduction of Minds

‘Your turn.’

And after that simple two-word dialogue balloon, it was time for complete improvisation.

Dave Sim, Minds (Third Printing, June 1998)

Not that there’s anything wrong with that choice  of  ”broad strokes” – but it does make for a meandering plotline – especially if it takes 26 years to finally finish it.

As to two of the major points Sim made in the series run – well, he might as well have been talking to a brick wall when he made his pitch for God in the novel (me being an agnostic).  As for the charge of misogyny – I do not believe that Sim hates women in general (the characterization of Jaka in particular not being demonized, but rather seen as a human being with faults) but does hate feminism as a social movement (the treatment of the Cirinists in Latter Days is a misreading by most as misogynism, substituting Sim’s dislike for the matriarchal society he created with dislike for women in general).

And what does it say when a reader like myself gets bored with the major points Sim tried to get across (again, Latter Days analysis of the Books of Moshe as an example), and skips over to his comments on the work in the back (and often enjoyed them more than the Art itself)?

I give Sim credit though – Steve Ditko chose the Path Less Traveled as well as Sim did.  Sim seems to have a better handle on his Art and Life, as Sim is now working on Glamourpuss, and Ditko has faded from the public eye. Will Sim do the same?

To sum up – do I feel that this series was worth the time to go over in detail enough to write these reviews?  Yes, I do.  I just want to warn off the “casual” reader – this (and I mean the entire series’ run) wasn’t written for you.

* And published in the final issues of that mammoth graphic novel, no less.

h1

Review: The Last Day (Cerebus Vol. 16)

September 13, 2009

From Wikipedia:

Second and concluding part of the story-arc Latter Days and the conclusion of the series. In the first 40 pages Cerebus has a dream or vision in which cosmology is seen as a reflection of Theology, complete with explanatory footnotes by Sim. Upon waking Cerebus — now incredibly aged, decrepit, pain-ridden, and mildly senile — makes the laborious trek to his writing desk to write down his new revelation. He then hides the manuscript, and it is implied that nobody will find it for two thousand years (a possible homage to I, Claudius in which the dying Claudius does the same thing).

Cerebus spends most of the rest of the book trying to persuade his chief of security, Walter O’Reilly (named after Corporal Walter (Radar) O’Reilly from the “M*A*S*H  TV series) to admit his son, Shep-Shep, with whom he remembers sharing an idyllic father-son relationship.  However, the Sanctuary is under lockdown due to opposition from a new and even more rabidly “feminist-homosexualist” group led by Shep-Shep’s mother, whom Cerebus refers to as “New Joanne”, which favors such “rights” as pedophilia, zoophilia, juvenile recreational drug use and lesbian motherhood. As a result, social values have undergone a complete breakdown.

Cerebus finally goes to bed despairing of seeing his son again, but Shep-Shep manages to sneak into Cerebus’ room late that night. Their subsequent conversation shatters Cerebus’ last illusions about his son. Shep-Shep has aligned himself with Cerebus’ mother who has been conducting genetic engineering experiments, partly with knowledge gained from Cirin’s earlier experimentation. Cerebus is disgusted and horrified when Shep-Shep shows him the results of one of the experiments and explains his mother’s plans.

As Shep-Shep leaves Cerebus grabs a knife, intending to kill him, but falls out of bed and breaks his neck, alone, unmourned, and unloved, just as the Judge had predicted. His life flashes before his eyes in a series of flashback panels and his ghost sees many of his old friends and enemies waiting for him in “the Light.” Jaka, Bear, and Ham beckon to him, and he eagerly rushes to join them, thinking they are in Heaven, but then he notices the absence of Rick and realises that the Light may in fact be Hell. He calls out to God for help, but is dragged into the Light nonetheless.

I suppose the finish of any creative work of this size and scope is probably going to be a let down – I mean, the lead-up is so momentous that the finish, with nowhere else to go, just…halts. And when that end to the story involves the main character’s death, well, there isn’t any more story is there? (Setting aside the frequency comic book superheroes get killed and resurrected at regular intervals…)

In this book we get that “cosmology & Theology examination” that, despite Sim’s best effort, well, put me to sleep. I tried my best, but no dice. Differing world views and such.

Moving on, we get (as most of the volumes have had) some funny, some serious, and plenty of gorgeous art.

last day

After finishing this undertaking, I have to ask myself: was the story satisfying?  I’d say, yes it was.  I can almost forgive Sim for his transgressions in page layout, dialog, digressions in the story, inserting himself into the narrative, what have you – just to say I’ve read and finished this novel.  Do I think that parts of the novel would’ve worked better as stand-alones? Certainly. Was the choice of the aardvark as protagonist a misstep? Absolutely.

But he completed the task he set for himself, didn’t he?

And, when Shep-Shep reveals what’s in the box through the narrative- pure Waterford, baby. (For an explanation of “waterford”, read this older review:

http://theclubabove.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/review-who-can-kill-a-child/

Now: skipping over to the notes section at the end of the book (which are very interesting reading to me), Sim relates an anecdote about his relationship with his parents ending, due in part to their atheism and self-destructive behavior.  You’ll have to read his accounting as to how he does so – he even asks a couple of times in the text, “Are you sure you want to stick around and watch this?”, either addressing himself at the time or addressing the reader.

All of us eventually have to make a break from our parents, physically and/or emotionally, but the way Sim did it was chilling to read.

As an aside: Sim often refers to himself as “crazy” or “insane” – maybe he shouldn’t write stuff like this in the notes…

Either coincidentaly or synchronistically, as I was deliberating (questions about his mother’s health) internally,  the SARS breakout in Toronto occurred and people started dropping like flies in Toronto’s “medical churches”.  Again, I wasn’t unduly troubled. The crisis had originated in China and I had assumed that casualties were mostly, if not exclusively, among the faithless. (Emphasis mine – Ed.)

Dave Sim, pg. 247, The Last Day, second printing, June 2004

Note the phraseology – not “the Chinese”, but “the faithless”. In a mostly-secular society, you are going to be called crazy if you ascribe belief in a Supreme Being as being the reason your nationality is being affected by disease.